July 16, 2025
An Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) report released in 2024 was so clear it was almost brutal: it predicted a shortage of 13,500 to 86,000 physicians by 2036. The worst news was that 10,000 to 19,900 individuals, or as much as 74% of the total shortfall, would be surgeons.1
This deficit could mean longer wait times, longer travel distances, and less timely care for patients in need of surgical procedures—situations exacerbated by the growing burden of chronic disease and rising median age among the US population. Without the physicians and surgeons needed to provide effective care, improving the health of US communities will be an overwhelming challenge.
Physician shortfalls can be attributed to many factors, but three causes stand out: a medical school moratorium, the cap on federally funded surgical trainees, and an anticipated surge in retirement rates.
The moratorium had its origin in a report on the future of medical education issued in September 1980 by the Graduate Medical Education (GME) National Advisory Committee to the US Department of Health and Human Services. This report predicted an oversupply of 145,000 physicians by the year 2000.2
This posed a serious concern. An oversupply could impede physicians’ abilities to advocate for adequate work conditions, appropriate compensation, and even high-quality patient care.
As a result, a self-imposed moratorium among US medical schools followed. Starting in 1981, medical student enrollment was maintained at approximately 16,000 seats per year,2 and no new medical schools were established to avoid training more physicians than the country needed.
In response to the predicted surplus of physicians, Congress also acted to limit federal support for GME in the Medicare program. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 capped the number of Medicare-supported residency positions at the levels that existed in 1996.
Since the federal government was and still is a primary source of funding for GME, this cap has further limited the number of physicians. In addition, GME slots are tied to their sponsoring institutions, and this freeze has locked in training in the geographic areas where programs were established—often far from areas experiencing the highest rate of population growth, such as Florida and the Southwestern US.3
The predicted oversupply did not materialize. By 2005, the moratorium had lasted for a quarter century. In that time, the US population had grown by 70 million people, medicine had specialized more extensively than ever before, and the logic of permitting zero growth among medical students had begun to seem misguided.
In addition, an aging population facing a growing burden of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, obesity, and diabetes—diseases that often require surgical treatment—has increased the demand for physicians, and especially surgeons.
Instead of an oversupply, the combined shift in physician training and population needs had created a shortage of surgeons.
Medical schools responded by lifting the moratorium. Existing schools quickly added seats to incoming classes and additional campuses, and entirely new schools sprang up. By 2020, a new plateau of nearly 21,000 annual graduates of MD-granting institutions had been reached—approximately 30% above the previous level of 16,000.4
Accordingly, the number of resident physicians increased, too, from about 108,000 in 2008–2009 to approximately 158,000 in 2022–2023, according to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) data, an increase of approximately 46%.5 (These data include international and US medical graduates.)
Per the AAMC, the number of active physicians grew from 766,000 to more than 949,000 (24%) between 2005 and 2024.5 Because the US population increased approximately 16% in the same period, it appeared that physicians were growing at a pace at least somewhat well-matched to population needs, offsetting the relatively small numbers educated between 1980 and 2005.
But not all specialties have grown at the same pace. While the number of surgical residents grew by approximately 37% (from about 21,000 in 2007–2008 to 29,000 in 2022–2023),5 the population of practicing surgeons rose by less than 10%, from approximately 142,000 to 155,000 surgeons.6
In addition, the limitation on the number of Medicare-supported GME positions has remained in place, which limits the growth of the medical profession. The government has acted only recently—and insufficiently—to ease these limitations. In the Consolidated Appropriations Acts of 2021 and 2023, Congress approved a combined total of 1,200 new positions. As of last year, only half of these positions have been allocated to teaching institutions nationwide. Among healthcare professionals, concerns are growing that the slow pace of GME expansion will bottleneck the training of US and international medical graduates.
According to National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data, in 2025, 99.8% of the available 1,778 surgical positions were filled on Match Day.7 However, the NRMP noted that approximately 20% of applicants, including more than 6% of US seniors in programs granting medical doctorates or doctorates of osteopathy, were unsuccessful in securing postgraduate positions across all specialties.7
The US needs those trainees. Using 7.5 general surgeons per 100,000 population as a benchmark, AAMC data now show that 21 states have fewer than the necessary number of general surgeons, a shortage that may be related to the cap on medical school enrollment in earlier years.8
At present, this has led to the view that rather than a surgeon shortage, a maldistribution of surgeons that overconcentrates resources in urban areas to the detriment of rural communities, may be a more pressing issue. A 2018 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) report to the Senate Appropriations Committee found that rural areas nationwide had on average only 69% of the general surgeons needed to meet demand, while large metropolitan areas had more general surgeons than strictly required to meet the needs of urban populations.9 (Read the April 2024 Bulletin article, “Physician Workforce Data Suggest Epochal Change,” for more details.)
The problem will take time to fix. For disciplines such as general or orthopaedic surgery, full training includes approximately 9 years of medical school and residency. With many academic training programs requiring 2 years of research training and 1–2 years in a fellowship, a surgeon may train for 14 years. Policies to address surgeon shortages, whether at the current or predicted future levels, need to account for this.
Whether a current shortage or maldistribution are in effect, signs suggest surgical workforce numbers may decline in the future as practicing surgeons retire. At present, approximately 25.6% of all surgeons in the US are aged 65 years or older, and surveys indicate that most physicians wish to retire by age 70.10 Very few surgical disciplines have sufficient residents available to replace this wave of retirees. A rough estimate derived from 2023 AAMC data on surgeons older than age 65 and 2022–2023 ACGME data on the number of current surgical residents suggest 10,937 surgeons will retire without replacements—well within the range of 10,000 to 19,900 that the AAMC has predicted.1
In addition, a JAMA Network Open study11 from 2023 surveyed nearly 19,000 physicians and found that, across all specialties, 32.6% had a moderate or strong urge to leave clinical practice within 2 years. Within surgical specialties, this statistic varied from nearly 40% in thoracic and neurologic surgery to less than 30% in plastic surgery and ophthalmology. In every case, however, the loss of so great a percentage of surgeons would significantly impede patient care.
The same study offered numerous insights into how to help. It found that professional fulfillment, peer support, supportive leadership, useful electronic health records, and good alignment between personal and organizational values all reduced intent to leave practice. Burnout, depression, and negative impact of work on personal relationships all increased intent to leave.
Elsewhere in the literature, surgeons have proposed helping surgical residents through mentoring, stronger peer-to-peer connections, and greater support during early and transitional phases of residency. In addition, greater efforts to help existing rural surgeons stay in practice and ease the maldistribution of surgeons in various practice settings are necessary.
The ACS offers a range of supports across the career span, starting with specialized education, outreach, and career discernment resources for medical students. The College also has created career-stage groups, particularly the Resident and Associate Society and Young Fellows Association, that bolster opportunities for networking, camaraderie, and support in early career. The ACS also has available several mentoring programs for surgeons, which have been posited to reduce intent to leave practice.
At the federal level, the ACS Division of Advocacy and Health Policy supports legislative efforts to expand Medicare support of GME, create specific designations for surgical shortages, and reduce the burden of student debt.
For example, in the current 119th session of Congress, the ACS endorsed the Resident Education Deferred Interest Act (HR 2028/S 942), which would allow borrowers in residency to defer student loan payments interest free, and the Specialty Physicians Advancing Rural Care Act (HR 2761/S 705), which would establish a new loan repayment program for specialty physicians.
The ACS also previously supported legislative efforts such as the Resident Physician Shortage Reduction Act, which would greatly expand the number of Medicare-supported GME spots, and the Ensuring Access to General Surgery Act, which would direct HRSA to study access to general surgery and, if needed, designate general surgery shortage areas. These bills are expected to be reintroduced in the 119th Congress.
In addition, a new research project to map the current distribution of surgeons of all specialties is in the works and expected to produce data that can bolster awareness of shortages and advocacy efforts in the future.
Helping ensure surgeons are able to maintain work-life balance is another priority, so the ACS supports solutions to reduce unnecessary paperwork and help surgeons learn about and effectively use artificial intelligence (AI), a technology often touted for its potential to improve electronic health records and lower administrative burdens on clinicians. Offerings on AI include several Clinical Congress sessions, as well as freestanding courses on the science behind AI in surgery.
The ACS also is pressing for improvements in workplace policies on pregnancy, parental leave, and lactation support for surgical trainees and practicing surgeons. In spring 2024, the College issued statements specifying appropriate support for family planning and childrearing among surgeons and surgical trainees, including eligibility for 12 weeks of leave after the birth of a child. The statements were endorsed by the American Board of Surgery and American Boards of Thoracic, Colon and Rectal, Neurological, Oral and Maxillofacial, and Plastic Surgery. This is one of several ways that the College connects with other surgical societies on supporting surgeons.
In addition, the ACS offers a range of support to rural surgeons, from practical advice on the ACS Practice Management hub to the work of the Advisory Council for Rural Surgery. The College remains active in advocacy to help surgeons access student loan forgiveness, healthy reimbursement rates, and other means to ensure their prosperity, and provides support for research, professional development, and career advancement.
Meeting the needs of patients requires an adequately sized workforce, as well as a workforce that is respected, treated well, and unified. While no single factor may forestall the shortage of surgeons, a concerted effort to help surgeons will be essential—both to bolster the number who practice and ensure optimal outcomes for their patients, in keeping with the College’s motto, “To Heal All with Skill and Trust.”
M. Sophia Newman is the Medical Writer and Speechwriter in the ACS Division of Integrated Communications in Chicago, IL.